Chinese innovators technology transfer job insecurities

Introduction
Chinese innovators in research lab

Chinese innovators

This research focuses on Chinese innovators technology transfer and perceived insecurities. The focus is on perceived job insecurity among university faculty researchers and technology transfer office (TTO) staff working with Chinese colleagues. As it happens, university technology transfer is growing in China. This is vital to China’s innovation and intellectual property program. This article provides a literature review used to create a theoretical framework for explaining conflicts between university technology transfer participants. Certainly, economic development and business competitiveness rely on innovation and intellectual property generation. Given increased investments in university research and Chinese universities, it is important to be aware of conflicts between university technology transfer office staff and faculty. Conflicts between university technology transfer participants can thwart efforts to create thriving, successful university technology innovation and commercialization programs.

Job Insecurity

This article provides a literature review which defines insecurity as perceived threats felt by both the faculty researchers and TTO staff.  From this literature review, I developed a theoretical conceptual framework and hypotheses to explain this phenomenon. This article examines the top impediment to faculty researchers’ engagement in the process: faculty indifference, ideological resistance, poor discoveries, limited TTO budget, bad TTO reputation, and university bureaucracy (Markman, 2005).

Other impediments examined are lack of trust in the process, delays, and building and guarding research collaboration funding relationships. Further, concerns exist among non-tenured faculty researchers. In addition, this article also examines the theoretical framework for the study of job insecurity related to university technology transfer. Job insecurity is a perceptual phenomenon (Sverke, 2002, Greenhalgh, 1984). This is an affected distress in alignment with stress theory. Stress theory teaches that the anticipation of a fundamental and unwanted event leads to strain (Sverke, 2002).

Conclusion

In summary, this research focuses on job insecurity among university faculty researchers and technology transfer office (TTO) staff. This study is very important to the field of university technology transfer because job insecurity can lead to reduced work effort, propensity to leave, and resistance to change (Greenhalgh, 1984). Personality, motivation, social exchange, social network, power dominance, worker resistance, and communication theories are discussed. Notably, a theoretical conceptual model of the phenomenon is also provided and discussed. Fourteen (14) related propositions are presented. This is groundwork for a future empirical study to test this theoretical concept for Chinese innovators technology transfer.

Read more here…

University Technology Transfer conflicts Love and Hate

Introduction
love and hate as options in a checklist with love chosen by a gentleman

University technology transfer conflicts stem from job insecurity

This research examines university technology transfer conflicts related to the love and hate between research faculty and technology transfer staff. We attempt to provide greater understanding of how research faculty’s personal values and research universities’ organization values may differ and why. Faculty researchers and tech transfer office (TTO) staff are perceived to be virtuous agents. When both are meeting each other’s needs, a “love” relationship exists. However, when these needs are not met, a “hate” relationship exists that is replete with doubt and uncertainty. Thus, this doubt and uncertainty create tension and subsequent conflicts.

Ethical concerns

There are many accounts where faculty researchers have not followed university policies and expectations. They often violate policy and ethical standards. Likewise, faculty report numerous examples of how TTO staff members’ negligence in servicing their attempts to be good institutional citizens have failed them. Thus, this paper explores this love/hate relationship and reveals numerous conflicts that call into question ethical concerns.

Conflict Management

This article provides a set of recommendations for reducing and potentially alleviating university technology transfer conflicts. Results from a thorough review of the literature on the relationship between faculty and university TTOs reveals that perceived job insecurity is underway. Some research faculty members as well as some TTO staff, unethically violate their university policies. Violations include faculty not disclosing inventions disclosures and the staff selection to not provide full services. There are ways to alleviate the conflict between faculty’s personal values regarding their inventions and university’s organizational values. There is a need to enact measures that build trust and reduce insecurity.  We not only examine this faculty/TTO staff ethical conflicts, but we offer a set of recommendations. In summary, we believe these recommendations will reduce the likelihood of unethical behavior. They encourage greater institutional commitment and trust.

Read the paper here…